<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/inc/tcd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>The Cryosphere Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1994-0432</issn>
		<eissn>1994-0440</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/tcd-2-111-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/2/111/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/2/111/2008/tcd-2-111-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/2/111/2008/tcd-2-111-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>111</start_page>
	<end_page>151</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-02-19</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Benchmark experiments for higher-order and full Stokes ice sheet models (ISMIP-HOM)</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Pattyn</name>
			<email>fpattyn@ulb.ac.be</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Perichon</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Aschwanden</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>B. Breuer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="4">
			<name>B. de Smedt</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="5">
			<name>O. Gagliardini</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="6">
			<name>G. H. Gudmundsson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="6">
			<name>R. Hindmarsh</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="7">
			<name>A. Hubbard</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="8">
			<name>J. V. Johnson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="3">
			<name>T. Kleiner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="9">
			<name>Y. Konovalov</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="6">
			<name>C. Martin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="10">
			<name>A. J. Payne</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="11">
			<name>D. Pollard</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="10">
			<name>S. Price</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="17" affiliations="3">
			<name>M. Rückamp</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="18" affiliations="12">
			<name>F. Saito</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="19" affiliations="13">
			<name>O. Souček</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="20" affiliations="14">
			<name>S. Sugiyama</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="21" affiliations="15">
			<name>T. Zwinger</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/03, Av. F. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Institute for Geophysics, University of Muenster, Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Muenster, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Vakgroep Geografie, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l&apos;Environnement (LGGE), CNRS, UJF-Grenoble I, BP 96, 38402 Saint Martin d&apos;Hères Cedex, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Physical Science Division, British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Centre for Glaciology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, SY23 3DP, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Department of Computer Science, Social Science Building Room 417, University of Montana, Missoula MT, 59812-5256, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="10" content_type="html">Bristol Glaciology Centre, School of Geographical Sciences, University Road, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="11" content_type="html">Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="12" content_type="html">Frontier Research Center for Global Change, 3173-25 Showamachi, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama City, Kanagawa 236-0001, Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="13" content_type="html">Department of Geophysics, Charles University Prague, V. Hole&amp;#x0161;ovi&amp;#x010D;kách 2, 18000 Praha 8, Czech Republic</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="14" content_type="html">Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Nishi-8, Kita-19, Sapporo 060-0819 Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="15" content_type="html">CSC-Scientific Computing Ltd., Keilaranta 14, P.O. Box 405, 02101 Espoo, Finland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We present the results of the first ice sheet model intercomparison project
for higher-order and full Stokes ice sheet models. These models are validated
in a series of six benchmark experiments of which one has an analytical
solution under simplifying assumptions. Five of the tests are diagnostic and
one experiment is prognostic or time dependent, for both 2-D and 3-D
geometries. The results show a good convergence of the different models even
for high aspect ratios. A clear distinction can be made between higher-order
models and those that solve the full system of equations. The latter show a
significantly better agreement with each other as well as with analytical
solutions, which demonstrates that they are hardly influenced by the used
numerics.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Blatter, H.: Velocity and Stress Fields in Grounded Glaciers: a Simple Algorithm for Including Deviatoric Stress Gradients, J. Glaciol., 41, 333&amp;ndash;344, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Blatter, H., Clarke, G., and Colinge, J.: Stress and Velocity Fields in Glaciers: Part II. Sliding and Basal Stress Distribution, J. Glaciol., 44, 457&amp;ndash;466, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Breuer, B., Lange, M., and Blindow, N.: Sensitivity Studies on Model Modifications to Assess the Dynamics of a Temperate Ice Cap, such as that on King George Island, Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 52, 235&amp;ndash;247, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Colinge, J. and Rappaz, J.: A Strongly Nonlinear Problem Arising in Glaciology, Mathem. Modelling Numer. Analysis, 33, 395&amp;ndash;406, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Gagliardini, O. and Zwinger, T.: The ISMIP&amp;ndash;HOM Benchmark Experiments Performed Using the Finite-Element Code Elmer, The Cryosphere Discuss., 2, 75&amp;ndash;109, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Gudmundsson, G.: Transmission of Basal Variability to a Glacier Surface, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B5), 2253, doi:10.1029/2002JB002107, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Hindmarsh, R.: A Numerical Comparison of Approximations to the Stokes Equations used in Ice Sheet and Glacier Modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 109, F01012, doi:10.1029/2003JF000065, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Hubbard, A., Blatter, H., Nienow, P., Mair, D., and Hubbard, B.: Comparison of a Three-Dimensional Model for Glacier Flow with Field Data from Haut Glacier d&apos;Arolla, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 44, 368&amp;ndash;378, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Hutter, K.: Theoretical Glaciology, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Huybrechts, P., Payne, T., and The EISMINT Intercomparison Group: The EISMINT Benchmarks for Testing Ice-Sheet Models, Ann. Glaciol., 23, 1&amp;ndash;12, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Huybrechts, P., Abe-Ouchi, A., Marsiat, I., Pattyn, F., Payne, T., Ritz, C., and Rommelaere, V.: Report of the Third EISMINT Workshop on Model Intercomparison, European Science Foundation (Strasbourg), 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> IPCC: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M., and Miller, H., p. 996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Johnson, J. and Staiger, J.: Modeling Long-Term Stability of the Ferrar Glacier, East Antarctica: Implications for Interpreting Cosmogenic Nuclide Inheritance, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F03S30, doi:10.1029/2006JF000599, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> MacAyeal, D.: Large-scale Ice Flow over a Viscous Basal Sediment: Theory and Application to Ice Stream B, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 4071&amp;ndash;4087, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> MacAyeal, D.: A Tutorial on the Use of Control Methods in Ice-Sheet Modeling, J. Glaciol., 39, 91&amp;ndash;98, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> MacAyeal, D., Rommelaere, V., Huybrechts, P., Hulbe, C., Determann, J., and Ritz, C.: An Ice-Shelf Model Test based on the Ross Ice Shelf, Ann. Glaciol., 23, 46&amp;ndash;51, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Martin, C., Navarro, F., Otero, J., Cuadrado, M., and Corcuera, M.: Three-dimensional Modelling of the Dynamics of Johnson Glacier (Livingstone Island, Antarctica), Ann. Glaciol., 39, 1&amp;ndash;8, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Nienow, P., Hubbard, A., Hubbard, B., Chandler, D., Mair, D., Sharp, M., and Willis, I.: Hydrological Controls on Diurnal Ice Flow Variability in Valley Glaciers, J. Geophys. Res., 110, F04002, doi:10.1029/2003JF000112, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Pattyn, F.: Transient Glacier Response with a Higher-Order Numerical Ice-Flow Model, J. Glaciol., 48, 467&amp;ndash;477, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Pattyn, F.: A New 3D Higher-Order Thermomechanical Ice-Sheet Model: Basic Sensitivity, Ice-Stream Development and Ice Flow across Subglacial Lakes, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B8), 2382, doi:10.1029/2002JB002329, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Pattyn, F.: Investigating the stability of subglacial lakes with a full Stokes ice sheet model, J. Glaciol., 54(185), in press, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Payne, A., Huybrechts, P., Abe-Ouchi, A., Calov, R., Fastook, J., Greve, R., Marshall, S., Marsiat, I., Ritz, C., Tarasov, L., and Thomassen, M.: Results from the EISMINT Model Intercomparsion: the Effects of Thermomechanical Coupling, J. Glaciol., 46, 227&amp;ndash;238, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Pollard, D. and DeConto, R.: A coupled ice-sheet/ice-shelf/sediment model applied to a marine-margin flowline: forced and unforced variations, in: Glacial Sedimentary Processes and Products, edited by: Hambrey, M., Christofferson, P., Glasser, N., and Hubbard, B., Blackwell Publishing, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Price, S., Waddington, E., and Conway, H.: A Full-Stress, Thermomechanical Flowband Model using the Finite Volume Method, J. Geophys. Res., 112(F03021), doi:10.1029/2006JF000725, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Sugiyama, S., Gudmundsson, G., and Ebling, J.: Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Temporal Variations in Basal Lubrications on Englacial Strain-Rate Distribution, Ann. Glaciol., 37, 49&amp;ndash;54, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Van der Veen, C. and Whillans, I.: Force Budget: I. Theory and Numerical Methods, J. Glaciol., 35, 53&amp;ndash;60, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Zwinger, T., Greve, R., Gagliardini, O., Shiraiwa, T., and Lyly, M.: A Full Stokes-flow Thermo-mechanical Model for Firn and Ice applied to the Gorshkov Crater Glacier, Kamchatka, Ann. Glaciol., 45, 29&amp;ndash;37, 2007. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

