<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/inc/tcd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>The Cryosphere Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1994-0432</issn>
		<eissn>1994-0440</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/tcd-3-895-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/3/895/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/3/895/2009/tcd-3-895-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/3/895/2009/tcd-3-895-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>895</start_page>
	<end_page>918</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-10-30</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Quasi-3-D resistivity imaging – mapping of heterogeneous frozen ground conditions using electrical resistivity tomography</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>C. Kneisel</name>
			<email>kneisel@uni-wuerzburg.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Bast</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Schwindt</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Physical Geography, University of Würzburg, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Up to now an efficient 3-D geophysical mapping of the subsurface in
mountainous environments with rough terrain has not been possible. A merging
approach of several closely spaced 2-D electrical resistivity tomography
(ERT) surveys to build up a quasi-3-D model of the electrical resistivity is
presented herein as a practical compromise for inferring subsurface
characteristics and lithology. The ERT measurements were realised in a small
glacier forefield in the Swiss Alps with complex terrain exhibiting a small
scale spatial variability of surface substrate.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
To build up the grid for the quasi-3-D measurements the ERT surveys were
arranged as parallel profiles and perpendicular tie lines. The measured 2-D
datasets were collated into one quasi-3-D file. A forward modelling approach
– based on studies at a permafrost site below timberline – was used to
optimize the geophysical survey design for the mapping of the mountain
permafrost distribution in the investigated glacier forefield.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Quasi-3-D geoelectrical imaging is a useful method for mapping of
heterogeneous frozen ground conditions and can be considered as a further
milestone in the application of near surface geophysics in mountain
permafrost environments.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bast, A. and Kneisel, C.: Quasi-3-D geoelectrical imaging as a new application for permafrost investigations: some methodological aspects, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 19–24 April 2009, EGU2009-5302, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Fortier, R., LeBlanc, A. M., Allard, M., Buteau, S., and Calmels, F.: Internal structure and conditions of permaforst mounds at Umiujaq in Nunavik, Canada, inferred from field investigation and electrical resistivity tomography, Can. J. Earth Sci., 45(3), 367–387, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Harris, C., Arenson, L. U., Christiansen, H. H., Etzelmüller, B., Frauenfelder, R., Gruber, S., Haeberli, W., Hauck, C., Hoelzle, M., Humlum, O., Isaksen, K., Kääb, A., Kern-Luetschg, M. A., Lehning, M., Matsuoka, N., Murton, J. B., Noetzli, J., Phillips, M., Ross, N., Seppälä, M. Springman, S. M., and Vonder Mühll, D.: Permafrost and climate in Europe: Monitoring and modelling thermal, geomorphological and geotechnical responses, Earth Sci. Rev., 92(3–4), 117–171, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Hauck, C. and Kneisel, C. (Eds.): Applied Geophysics in Periglacial Environments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 240~pp., 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C.: New insights into mountain permafrost occurrence and characteristics in glacier forefields at high altitude through the application of 2-D resistivity imaging, Permafrost Periglac., 15, 221–227, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C.: The nature and dynamics of frozen ground in alpine and subarctic periglacial environments, The Holocene, accepted, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C. and Hauck, C.: Electrical methods, in: Applied geophysics in periglacial environments, edited by: Hauck, C. and Kneisel, C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1–27, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C. and Bast, A.: Looking inside – using a traditional method for permafrost investigation with a new application: 3-D Geoelectrical Imaging, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 19–24 April 2009, EGU2009-5067, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C. and Kääb, A.: Mountain permafrost dynamics within a recently exposed glacier forefield inferred by a combined geomorphological, geophysical and photogrammetrical approach, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 32(12), 1797–1810, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C. and Schwindt, D.: Geophysical mapping of isolated permafrost lenses at a sporadic permafrost site at low altitude in the Swiss Alps, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Permafrost, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, 29 June–3 July, 959–964, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C., Hauck, C., and Vonder Mühll, D.: Permafrost below the timberline confirmed and characterized by geoelectrical resistivity measurements, Bever Valley, eastern Swiss Alps, Permafrost Periglac., 11, 295–304, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Kneisel, C., Hauck, C., Fortier, R., and Moorman, B.: Advances in geophysical methods for permafrost investigations, Permafrost Periglac., 19(2), 157–178, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Loke, M. H.: Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys, online available at: http://www.geoelectrical.com/coursenotes.zip, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Loke, M. H. and Barker, R. D.: Least-square deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections, Geophysics, 60, 1682–1690, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Loke, M. H. and Barker, R. D.: Practical techniques for 3-D resistivity surveys and data inversion, Geophys. Prospect., 44, 499–523, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Marescot, L., Loke, M. H., Chappellier, D., Delaloye, R., Lambiel, C., and Reynard, E.: Assessing reliability of 2-D resistivity imaging in mountain permafrost studies using the depth of investigation index method, Near Surf. Geophys., 1, 57–67, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Schwindt, D. and Kneisel, C.: Quasi-3-D resistivity imaging – results from geophysical mapping and forward modelling, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 19–24 April 2009, EGU2009-1156, 2009. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

