Comparison of direct and geodetic mass balances on an annual time scale
A. Fischer1, H. Schneider2, G. Merkel3, and R. Sailer41Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, Austria 2Institute of Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, Austria 3Faculty of Geoinformation, University of Applied Sciences – Fachhochschule München, Germany 4Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Received: 13 Jan 2011 – Accepted for review: 04 Feb 2011 – Discussion started: 14 Feb 2011
Abstract. Very accurate airborne laserscanning (ALS) elevation data was used to calculate the annual volume changes for Hintereisferner and Kesselwandferner in the Ötztal Alps, Austria for 2001/2002–2008/2009. The comparison of the altitude of 51 recently GPS surveyed ground control points showed that the accuracy of the ALS DEMs is better than 0.3 m. The geodetic mass balance was calculated from the volume change using detailed maps of the firn cover and applying corrections for the seasonal snow cover. The maximum snow height at the time of the elevation data flight was 0.5 m averaged over the glacier surface. The volume change data was compared to in situ mass balance data for the total area and at the stakes. For the total period of 8 yr, the difference between the geodetic and the direct mass balance is 2.398 m w.e. on Hintereisferner and 1.380 m w.e. on Kesselwandferner, corresponding to about two times the mean annual mass balance. The vertical ice flow velocity was measured and found to be on the same order of magnitude as the mass balance at KWF. This is an indicator that volume change data does not allow the calculation of ablation or accumulation rates without detailed measurements or models of the vertical ice flow velocity. Therefore, only direct mass balance data allow process studies or investigation of the climatic controls of the resulting mass changes.
Fischer, A., Schneider, H., Merkel, G., and Sailer, R.: Comparison of direct and geodetic mass balances on an annual time scale, The Cryosphere Discuss., 5, 565-604, doi:10.5194/tcd-5-565-2011, 2011.