Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-2043-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
25 Apr 2014
Review status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal The Cryosphere (TC). The revised manuscript was not accepted.
Quantifying the Jakobshavn Effect: Jakobshavn Isbrae, Greenland, compared to Byrd Glacier, Antarctica
T. Hughes1, A. Sargent2, J. Fastook3, K. Purdon4, J. Li5, J.-B. Yan5, and S. Gogineni6 1School of Earth and Climate Sciences, Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, USA
2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maine, Orono, USA
3Computer Sciences Department, Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, USA
4Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, Geography Department, University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA
5Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA
6Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA
Abstract. The Jakobshavn Effect is a series of positive feedback mechanisms that was first observed on Jakobshavn Isbrae, which drains the west-central part of the Greenland Ice Sheet and enters Jakobshavn Isfjord at 69°10'. These mechanisms fall into two categories, reductions of ice-bed coupling beneath an ice stream due to surface meltwater reaching the bed, and reductions in ice-shelf buttressing beyond an ice stream due to disintegration of a laterally confined and locally pinned ice shelf. These uncoupling and unbuttressing mechanisms have recently taken place for Byrd Glacier in Antarctica and Jakobshavn Isbrae in Greenland, respectively. For Byrd Glacier, no surface meltwater reaches the bed. That water is supplied by drainage of two large subglacial lakes where East Antarctic ice converges strongly on Byrd Glacier. Results from modeling both mechanisms are presented here. We find that the Jakobshavn Effect is not active for Byrd Glacier, but is active for Jakobshavn Isbrae, at least for now. Our treatment is holistic in the sense it provides continuity from sheet flow to stream flow to shelf flow. It relies primarily on a force balance, so our results cannot be used to predict long-term behavior of these ice streams. The treatment uses geometrical representations of gravitational and resisting forces that provide a visual understanding of these forces, without involving partial differential equations and continuum mechanics. The Jakobshavn Effect was proposed to facilitate terminations of glaciation cycles during the Quaternary Ice Age by collapsing marine parts of ice sheets. This is unlikely for the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, based on our results for Byrd Glacier and Jakobshavn Isbrae, without drastic climate warming in high polar latitudes. Warming would affect other Antarctic ice streams already weakly buttressed or unbuttressed by an ice shelf. Ross Ice Shelf would still protect Byrd Glacier.

Citation: Hughes, T., Sargent, A., Fastook, J., Purdon, K., Li, J., Yan, J.-B., and Gogineni, S.: Quantifying the Jakobshavn Effect: Jakobshavn Isbrae, Greenland, compared to Byrd Glacier, Antarctica, The Cryosphere Discuss., 8, 2043-2118, https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-2043-2014, 2014.
T. Hughes et al.
T. Hughes et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
829 890 136 1,855 48 71

Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2014)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2014)

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 25 Jun 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share