Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.790 IF 4.790
  • IF 5-year value: 5.921 IF 5-year
  • CiteScore value: 5.27 CiteScore
  • SNIP value: 1.551 SNIP 1.551
  • IPP value: 5.08 IPP 5.08
  • SJR value: 3.016 SJR 3.016
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 63 Scimago H
    index 63
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Discussion papers
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 20 Sep 2019

Submitted as: research article | 20 Sep 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal The Cryosphere (TC).

Melt in Antarctica derived from SMOS observations at L band

Marion Leduc-Leballeur1, Ghislain Picard2, Giovanni Macelloni1, Arnaud Mialon3, and Yann H. Kerr3 Marion Leduc-Leballeur et al.
  • 1Institute of Applied Physics “Nello Carrara” – National Council of Research, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
  • 2UGA, CNRS, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), UMR 5001, Grenoble, 38041, France
  • 3CESBIO (CNES, CNRS, IRD, UPS), Univ. Toulouse, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 09, France

Abstract. Melt occurrence in Antarctica is derived from L-band observations from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite between the austral summer 2010/11 and 2017/18. The detection algorithm is adapted from a threshold method previously developed for 19 GHz passive microwave measurements from Special Sensor Microwave Imagers (SSM/I, SSMIS). The comparison of daily melt occurrence retrieved from 1.4 GHz and 19 GHz observations shows an overall close agreement, but a lag of few days is usually observed by SMOS at the beginning of the melt season. To understand the difference, we performed a theoretical analysis using a microwave emission radiative transfer model that shows that the sensitivity of 1.4 GHz signal to liquid water is significantly weaker than at 19 GHz if the water is only present in the uppermost tens of centimeters of the snowpack. Conversely, 1.4 GHz measurements are sensitive to water when spread over at least 1 m and when present at depth, up to hundreds of meters. This is explained by the large penetration depth in dry snow and by the long wavelength (21 cm). We conclude that SMOS and higher frequency radiometers provide interesting complementary information on melt occurrence and on the location of the water in the snowpack.

Marion Leduc-Leballeur et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Marion Leduc-Leballeur et al.
Marion Leduc-Leballeur et al.
Total article views: 319 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
230 85 4 319 5 3
  • HTML: 230
  • PDF: 85
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 319
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Sep 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Sep 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 210 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 209 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
No saved metrics found.
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 08 Dec 2019
Publications Copernicus